2
Nico Rosberg has played down a controversy about an episode of apparent 'radio coaching' inequality during the Canadian grand prix. During the Montreal race, Lewis Hamilton's engineer told the British driver that while his Mercedes teammate Rosberg has no problems with fuel consumption, the German's brake situation was "critical".
But when Rosberg asked about the state of Hamilton's car, his engineer replied that the 'radio coaching' ban meant he was not allowed to answer. "Ugh," Rosberg replied. Told that the episode might imply favouritism towards Hamilton, team boss Toto Wolff insisted: "We have already clarified the matter internally. The statement from Lewis' engineer had no impact on the race. I stress once again: the drivers have absolutely equal treatment."
In his latest column for Bild newspaper, Rosberg has backed Wolff's claim that both Mercedes drivers are treated equally. "There has been a lot of debate about whether Lewis received more information than me during our battle," he said. "But there is definitely no difference in how the team treatd us as drivers," Rosberg insisted, "no matter what they said to Lewis" during the race. "I have 100 per cent confidence in the team," he added.
He said that level of equality actually makes it harder for him to fight Hamilton during a race. "People often ask me why I don't just push a bit harder and overtake Lewis," said Rosberg. "But you can't forget that my main rival has exactly the same car as me, and also that it is always possible for the other side to look at my settings and copy them. In this situation, I just need to be ahead on Saturday, as qualifying is now more important than ever," he added. (GMM)
Grand Prix of Belgium
C. Sainz jr
67 members have this team as their favourite
Replies (2)
Login to replyscf1fan
Posts: 58
While I was watching the race, it sure sounded like one driver was being "coached," and if what LH received wasn't "coaching, then NR was being "stiffed!" Most of the additional information wasn't of huge value, but LH got more detailed information and was coached during the race when that same kind of information was being refused to NR. Once again, Toto's assertions fall a little flat.
.
Specifically when LH was instructed how to conserve fuel and by being told to extend his braking zone by an increasing distance. LH was also given information about the state of NR's car, while it appears that NR was being refused similar information about LH's.
.
I'd assume that it's just that the rule isn't understood equally by all the parties, but it really should be that hard; particularly in reference to intra-team information! If MB wouldn't have had that particular piece of information from another team (i.e. Williams) why should it be provided about your teammate?
scf1fan
Posts: 58
Dang, wish I could edit . . . "should be that hard" should have been "shouldn't be that hard"