Horner: "F1 should increase engine allocation"

  • Published on 06 Sep 2017 11:21
  • comments 10
  • By: Rob Veenstra

Christian Horner says he will propose that F1 scraps plans to further ramp up the controversial long-life engine rules next year. Already on new F1 chief Ross Brawn's table is an idea to reform the often farcical imposition of grid penalties for engine component changes.

But Horner, the Red Bull boss, told Salzburger Nachrichten newspaper that the real problem is that drivers are not allocated enough engines per season under the current and ultra-complex 'power unit' regulations. For instance, with some drivers already well into their allocation of four engines after 13 races in 2017, the regulations are set to reduce that limit to three engines in 2018.

"This problem should be the number one issue at the next strategy (group) meeting," said Horner. The Austrian newspaper said Horner proposes that F1 ups the per-driver engine allocation to five per season. Horner added: "It would be a pity if the world championship was decided by something like the number of engines." (GMM)

Nothing to vote about. Its silly to decrease it further.

  • 1
  • Sep 6 2017 - 12:17

Replies (10)

Login to reply
  • kngrthr

    Posts: 203

    Agree with him.

    4 engines is rediculous, 3 is just stupid.

    lets have a vote.

    • + 0
    • Sep 6 2017 - 11:41
    • Nothing to vote about. Its silly to decrease it further.

      • + 1
      • Sep 6 2017 - 12:17
    • Barron

      Posts: 625

      Stupido +1

      • + 0
      • Sep 7 2017 - 13:02
  • The penalties in Monza were a joke. Drivers who dropped out in Q1 started at place 9 and 10 because of the penalties. Decreasing the number of engines per driver is going to make everything worse will every race at Spa and Monza a joke because of the grid penalties

    • + 1
    • Sep 6 2017 - 14:13
  • Disagree, better if they make engines which last longer and cut costs....

    • + 0
    • Sep 6 2017 - 18:40
    • Yes, but how are they going to do that? They are trying, Im sure of that, but looking at it, only one supplier can guarantee decent reliability for their customers. That'd be Mercedes. Cutting costs is something they should do anyway, and Im all for that, but the problem is that the regulations do as of now hurt the sport. Having 3 engines each isnt realistic, and would make the sport a penalty marathon snark fest. Like I've said, they dont need to increase it to 5 of each part anymore, most of them dont need that, but let them stick with 4 of each, or revamp the system to allow more flexibility in what parts the teams can use. Most doesnt need 4 ICEs, for an example, while most seem to use up MGU-H:es faster than I change underwear.

      • + 0
      • Sep 6 2017 - 19:38
    • mbmwe36

      Posts: 533

      I guarantee you there is nothing they would rather do. But when you're in an arms race, that's never going to happen. But Ferrari and Mercedes, as well as Honda and Renault really, are pushing the envelope as much aso the can for incremental gains, oftentimes that leads to failure because you went too far.
      They should make the engines so simple that there is only so much you can do before you are entering the point of diminishing returns. Then allocate a number of engines equal to the number of races in a season. And if an engine blows up after three l they've used their allocated engines in races, they should be able to re-use an earlier one, or use an extra at the cost of say a 5 grid penalty.

      • + 0
      • Sep 6 2017 - 19:43
    • denis1304

      Posts: 284

      If I remember correctly Wolf said that development to make engines last longer is actually more expensive than producing extra engine

      • + 0
      • Sep 7 2017 - 11:03
    • Could very well be. Then again, Mercedes really dont seem to have much of a problem with reliability, so they probably want the regulations to decrease the allowed allocations, since it'll impact their rivals worse than themselves.

      • + 0
      • Sep 9 2017 - 07:20
  • Basically the engines have't caught up with the regs and have been pushing it too far, once they relax development in line with keeping inside the regs, reliability will come.

    • + 0
    • Sep 7 2017 - 10:02

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 01:52

BEGrand Prix of Belgium

Local time 01:52

World Championship standings 2025

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Related news

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Formula 1 Calendar - 2025

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrain
14 - Mar 16
Australia
21 - Mar 23
China
4 - Apr 6
Japan
11 - Apr 13
Bahrain
18 - Apr 20
Saudi Arabia
2 - May 4
United States of America
16 - May 18
Italy
23 - May 25
Monaco
30 - Jun 1
Spain
13 - Jun 15
Canada
27 - Jun 29
Austria
4 - Jul 6
United Kingdom
25 - Jul 27
Belgium
1 - Aug 3
Hungary
29 - Aug 31
Netherlands
5 - Sep 7
Italy
19 - Sep 21
Azerbaijan
3 - Oct 5
Singapore
17 - Oct 19
United States of America
24 - Oct 26
Mexico
7 - Nov 9
Brazil
21 - Nov 23
United States of America
28 - Nov 30
Qatar
5 - Dec 7
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2025

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
14 - Mar 16
Australia Albert Park
21 - Mar 23
4 - Apr 6
11 - Apr 13
18 - Apr 20
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
2 - May 4
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
16 - May 18
23 - May 25
Monaco Monte Carlo
30 - Jun 1
13 - Jun 15
27 - Jun 29
Austria Red Bull Ring
4 - Jul 6
United Kingdom Silverstone
25 - Jul 27
1 - Aug 3
Hungary Hungaroring
29 - Aug 31
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
5 - Sep 7
Italy Monza
19 - Sep 21
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
3 - Oct 5
17 - Oct 19
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
24 - Oct 26
7 - Nov 9
Brazil Interlagos
21 - Nov 23
United States of America Las Vegas Street Circuit
28 - Nov 30
5 - Dec 7
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule
show sidebar